Chinese court contradicts government’s stance on virtual currencies, declares them to be legal prope

cyptouser11 months agoSpot Exchanges253

Chinese court contradicts government’s stance on virtual currencies, declares them to be legal property

A Chinese court has reportedly ruled that virtual currency should not be immediately treated as illegal under the nation’s legal framework, in apparent contravention to prevailing CCP policy.

Beijing-based Web3 news outlet Odaily reported Sept. 1 that the People’s Court of China had ruled that virtual currency should not be classified as illegal within the current policy framework.

Citing court documents, Odaily reported that the court held that virtual currencies should be considered property under the current law. It suggested that cases dealing with criminal proceeds of virtual currencies be handled on a case-by-case basis to balance individual property rights and public interests.

At press time, the primary court documents were not publicly accessible.

This shift in legal perspective is intriguing, given China’s historical opposition to cryptocurrencies. China has a long history of antagonism towards the crypto industry. In 2013, the Chinese government prohibited banks from handling Bitcoin transactions; in 2017, it banned initial coin offerings (ICOs); it cracked down on Bitcoin mining operations in 2019 and eventually imposed outright bans on crypto trading and mining in 2021. These are but a few of the many other measures the CCP has taken to curb crypto adoption within the country.

Precedent

This is not the first time a Chinese court has challenged government policy on crypto. A 2018 case in Hangzhou also upheld the legal status of Bitcoin as “virtual property,” marking the first time a Chinese court has appeared to contradict existing policy. In that case, despite the illegal status of trading and mining of Bitcoin, the court ruled that Bitcoin had the attributes of property: value, scarcity, and responsibility. It is unclear if this ruling was consulted as precedent for today’s ruling.

China’s history with blockchain and cryptocurrency is a complex narrative marked by an ongoing tension between innovation and centralized control. On one hand, China has shown significant interest in harnessing the potential of blockchain technology. It has published national blockchain standards to guide industry development, launched a national blockchain research center, and taken significant strides toward implementing the digital yuan, the world’s first true Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). These efforts have all been centralized, with the state playing the most crucial role in guiding and controlling blockchain technology use cases.

The CCP’s enthusiasm for blockchain technology does not extend to decentralized cryptocurrencies. More than twenty cryptocurrency firms left China due to a severe ban on crypto, underscoring the government’s desire to maintain strict control over the country’s financial system. The Chinese government has exhibited a clear preference for technologies it can regulate and control, such as its digital yuan, which is centrally issued and controlled by the People’s Bank of China.

Furthermore, the country’s stance toward generative AI regulations is demonstrating a similarly authoritarian approach, mandating that AI developments must adhere to the “core values of socialism.” While the country continues to foster innovation, it does so within a tightly controlled framework that aligns with its socio-political objectives.


The content on this website comes from the Internet. Due to the inconvenience of proofreading the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content of some content, it may be temporarily impossible to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content. For copyright issues or other issues caused by this, please Call or email this site. It will be deleted or changed immediately after verification.

related articles

Sam Bankman-Fried lawyers decry procedural breach as evidence pages pile to 7.7 million

Sam Bankman-Fried lawyers decry procedural breach as evidence pages pile to 7.7 million

Sam Bankman-Fried’s lawyers have objected to an additional 3.7 million pages of discovery documents...

The SEC is exceeding its authority and encroaching on Congress’ lawmaking: Senator Lummis

The SEC is exceeding its authority and encroaching on Congress’ lawmaking: Senator Lummis

U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis filed an amicus brief on August 11 supporting Coinba...

Craig Wright unable to provide sufficient evidence of funds in latest Satoshi court case

In the latest legal chapter of the ongoing Satoshi Nakamoto identity saga, self-proclaimed Bitcoin c...

Robinhood strikes deal with U.S. Marshal Service to buy back shares seized from Sam Bankman-Fried

Robinhood‘s proposed deal to repurchase shares seized from Sam Bankman-Fried by the U.S. Marshal Service (USMS) has been approved by a federal court in the Southern District of New York.

As a result, Robinhood will be allowed to buy back shares seized from Bankman-Fried’s Emergent Fidelity Technologies for $605.7 million, according to a statement released by the company.

After FTX and Emergent filed for bankruptcy protection last year, the U.S. government took custody of Bankman-Fried’s Robinhood shares. In February, Robinhood announced its plan to repurchase the stake.

Cash, stocks, and crypto

According to the agreement, Robinhood will buy back 55.3 million shares at $10.96 each, utilizing corporate cash from its balance sheet, which featured over $6 billion in cash and investments as of its latest quarterly report.

Bankman-Fried, who previously held a 7.6% stake in Robinhood, had expressed no intentions of gaining control over the trading platform. He had voiced enthusiasm about Robinhood’s business prospects, hinting at potential partnerships with the platform. However, the sudden bankruptcy of FTX led to the seizure and dissolution of his fortune, which was once estimated to be around $26 billion.

The FTX founder sought to retain ownership of Robinhood shares worth $450 million. He vehemently disputed the bankrupt exchange’s “legal claims” over the assets, insisting that he and Gary Wang were the primary holders of the shares, not Alameda Research or any other entities implicated in the FTX bankruptcy.

Robinhood has demonstrated robust strength within the crypto market, underlined by its substantial holdings in Bitcoin (

Robinhood strikes deal with U.S. Marshal Service to buy back shares seized from Sam Bankman-Fried

Robinhood‘s proposed deal to repurchase shares seized from Sam Bankman-Fried by the U.S. Marshal Ser...

NFL star Trevor Lawrence and 2 YouTube influencers settled the FTX endorsement class-action: Report

FTX garnered significant attention through celebrity endorsements, including naming rights to the Mi...

Binance to seek dismissal of CFTC charges in ongoing legal battle

Binance, one of the world's largest cryptocurrency exchanges, is currently engaged in a complex...