DCG labels Gemini lawsuit as ‘character assassination’ in motion to dismiss

cyptouser1 years agoDerivatives Exchanges358

DCG labels Gemini lawsuit as ‘character assassination’ in motion to dismiss

Digital Currency Group (DCG) filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit brought against it by crypto exchange Gemini, according to an Aug. 10 court filing.

DCG described the Gemini lawsuit as a continuation of the exchange’s public relations “character assassination” campaign started by its co-founders, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.

Accuses Gemini of deflecting

According to DCG, the Winklevoss twins are trying to deflect blame from their exchange’s users over their role in the defunct Gemini Earn program through vicious, personal, and false tweets that wrongly accused its founder Barry Silbert.

The Gemini Earn program was formerly operated in cooperation with the bankrupt subsidiary of DCG, Gemini. The program rewarded customers who lent cryptocurrency to the program. However, the program folded up after FTX’s collapse last year.

DCG stated that it could not be held responsible for the program’s failure as it had “virtually nothing” to do with it. It pointed out that the Master Loan Agreement signed by Gemini’s customers explicitly stated that none of the bankrupt lender’s parent company would be a party to any liabilities or obligations.

The crypto investment company wrote:

“Gemini tries in various ways to hold Defendants responsible for alleged misrepresentations by Genesis, but Gemini’s efforts to impute them to Defendants fail as a matter of law. It is a settled principle of law that parents are not liable for the conduct of their subsidiaries.”

Asides from that, DCG noted that the exchange failed to attach Genesis as a defendant in the case despite both companies’ corporate relationship.

DCG further alleged that Gemini failed to prove how Silbert representation to Cameron Winklevoss was fraudulent or how it aided and abetted any fraudulent activity.

The firm concluded that the Court should strike out Gemini’s claims with prejudice because “no
additional allegations could cure the substantive defects in the complaint.”


The content on this website comes from the Internet. Due to the inconvenience of proofreading the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content of some content, it may be temporarily impossible to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content. For copyright issues or other issues caused by this, please Call or email this site. It will be deleted or changed immediately after verification.

related articles

American couple accused of laundering stolen Bitfinex funds arrange plea deal

A couple accused of money laundering in connection to a 2016 hack of the crypto exchange Bitfinex ha...

FTT holders left hanging in proposed FTX restart plan

FTT holders left hanging in proposed FTX restart plan

Bankrupt FTX has submitted a proposal to restart its international exchange if it can get...

Coinbase raises bond buyback limit to $180M amid a surge in investor interest

Coinbase increased its bond buyback limit to $180 million and extended its deadline to Sept. 18, acc...

FTX revises bankruptcy court motion to expedite crypto claim settlements

FTX revises bankruptcy court motion to expedite crypto claim settlements

FTX Trading Ltd. has filed a revised motion seeking bankruptcy court approval of streamlin...

Prosecutors withdraw campaign finance charges against Sam Bankman-Fried

U.S. prosecutors have withdrawn political campaign financing charges against former FTX CEO Sam...

Sam Bankman-Fried pleads not guilty as lawyers complain about neglected vegan diet, prescription med

FTX founder and former CEO Sam Bankman-Fried has once again pleaded not guilty&n...