DCG labels Gemini lawsuit as ‘character assassination’ in motion to dismiss

cyptouser1 years agoDerivatives Exchanges376

DCG labels Gemini lawsuit as ‘character assassination’ in motion to dismiss

Digital Currency Group (DCG) filed motions to dismiss the lawsuit brought against it by crypto exchange Gemini, according to an Aug. 10 court filing.

DCG described the Gemini lawsuit as a continuation of the exchange’s public relations “character assassination” campaign started by its co-founders, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss.

Accuses Gemini of deflecting

According to DCG, the Winklevoss twins are trying to deflect blame from their exchange’s users over their role in the defunct Gemini Earn program through vicious, personal, and false tweets that wrongly accused its founder Barry Silbert.

The Gemini Earn program was formerly operated in cooperation with the bankrupt subsidiary of DCG, Gemini. The program rewarded customers who lent cryptocurrency to the program. However, the program folded up after FTX’s collapse last year.

DCG stated that it could not be held responsible for the program’s failure as it had “virtually nothing” to do with it. It pointed out that the Master Loan Agreement signed by Gemini’s customers explicitly stated that none of the bankrupt lender’s parent company would be a party to any liabilities or obligations.

The crypto investment company wrote:

“Gemini tries in various ways to hold Defendants responsible for alleged misrepresentations by Genesis, but Gemini’s efforts to impute them to Defendants fail as a matter of law. It is a settled principle of law that parents are not liable for the conduct of their subsidiaries.”

Asides from that, DCG noted that the exchange failed to attach Genesis as a defendant in the case despite both companies’ corporate relationship.

DCG further alleged that Gemini failed to prove how Silbert representation to Cameron Winklevoss was fraudulent or how it aided and abetted any fraudulent activity.

The firm concluded that the Court should strike out Gemini’s claims with prejudice because “no
additional allegations could cure the substantive defects in the complaint.”


The content on this website comes from the Internet. Due to the inconvenience of proofreading the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content of some content, it may be temporarily impossible to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content. For copyright issues or other issues caused by this, please Call or email this site. It will be deleted or changed immediately after verification.

related articles

Federal prosecutors want Sam Bankman-Fried’s bail revoked

Federal prosecutors have requested that Sam Bankman-Fried’s bail be revoked as the former...

Coinbase to file motion to dismiss SEC lawsuit in its ‘entirety’

Leading cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase, is set to file a motion to dismiss the ongoing lawsuit fr...

Bankrupt crypto giants FTX and Genesis reach agreement to resolve billion-dollar claims

Bankrupt crypto companies FTX and Genesis Global announced they had reached anagreement in principle...

Ripple legal chief says Terra ruling does not change XRP’s status

Ripple Chief legal officer Stuart Alderoty has poured cold water on notions that the ruling in the S...

FTX lawfirm hit with class action over alleged role in FTX cover up

FTX lawfirm hit with class action over alleged role in FTX cover up

A new class action lawsuit makes severe allegations that high-profile Silicon Valley law f...

NFL star Trevor Lawrence and 2 YouTube influencers settled the FTX endorsement class-action: Report

FTX garnered significant attention through celebrity endorsements, including naming rights to the Mi...