Ether ETF approved, but Gary Gensler didn’t vote for it — Here’s why

cyptouser6 months agoCryptocurrencies News142
55966e89>

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved the spot Ether exchange-traded fund (ETF) on May 23, but the approval process differed slightly from the spot Bitcoin ETF approval in January. 

Unlike the spot Bitcoin (BTC) ETF that was approved via voting by a five-member committee including SEC chief Gary Gensler, the spot Ether (ETH) ETF was approved by the Trading and Markets Division of the SEC.

The SEC approved the 19b-4 form of BlackRock, Fidelity, Grayscale, Bitwise, VanEck, Ark, Invesco Galaxy and Franklin Templeton but declined to comment beyond the official decision. The official filing read:

“For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.”

While many in the crypto community were curious about the difference in the approval process of the two crypto ETFs, Bloomberg ETF analyst James Seyffart called it a “Norm.”

He said things are typically done in the same for many approvals, and if the SEC required “an official vote for every decision or every document -— it’d be insane. It would have been nice to see where the political lines were drawn.”

Related: SEC’s ETF decision means ETH and ’a lot’ of other tokens are not securities

However, not everyone seems to be convinced by Seyffart’s analysis. A user on X pointed out that the commissioner can challenge the decision within the next 10 days, and the main reason for the delegated authority was to hide the votes as it would be political.

Source: James Seyffart 

A few others attributed the SEC’s decision to several factors, including political pressure, the upcoming elections and the implementation of ESG rules.

Another major difference between the approval processes of the two crypto ETFs is that all 11 BTC ETFs started trading the day after their approval, as they also got S1 clearance.

At the same time, ETH ETF trading might take weeks or even months before debuting on the stock exchange, as the ETF filers have yet to receive the S-1 SEC registration.

Magazine: Godzilla vs. Kong: SEC faces fierce battle against crypto’s legal firepower

The content on this website comes from the Internet. Due to the inconvenience of proofreading the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content of some content, it may be temporarily impossible to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the copyright or content. For copyright issues or other issues caused by this, please Call or email this site. It will be deleted or changed immediately after verification.

related articles

New UK law grants authorities power to seize crypto without arrest

The government of the U.K. has approved a bill enhancing law enforcement’s authority to confis...

Gemini agrees to return $1.1 billion to Earn customers as part of NYDFS settlement

The New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) reached a settlement agreement with Wink...

CoinShares poised to enter U.S. market through Valkyrie ETF acquisition deal

CoinShares, one of Europe’s largest asset managers, “has secured an exclusive optionR...

Sustainable finance and digital identity — Interview with Sovereign Wallet

Sustainable finance and digital identity — Interview with Sovereign Wallet

55966e89˃As blockchain technology continues to reshape the financial landscape, companies are strivi...

Arthur Hayes sees new arbitrage opportunities in SEC's crypto ETF concerns

Arthur Hayes, the co-founder and former CEO of BitMEX, highlighted the potential “juicy arbitr...

Solana community votes to give validators all priority fees

Solana community votes to give validators all priority fees

55966e89˃On May 27, the Solana community voted in favor of giving network validators 100% of priorit...